Конспект урока по английскому языку "Graffiti" - 11 класс
план-конспект занятия по английскому языку (11 класс)

Открытый урок английского языка по теме “Преступление и наказание”

Характеристики урока (занятия)

Уровень образования: старшее общее образование

Класс: 11 А класс

Предмет: Английский язык

Тип урока: Урок закрепления знаний, дискуссия

Используемое оборудование: доска, книга, рабочая тетрадь, раздаточный материал

Цели:

Обучающая:

1. развитие коммуникативной способности (развитие навыков монологической речи)
2. закрепление активной лексики, разговорных клише и речевых образцов
3. закрепление грамматических навыков
4. закрепление навыков чтения
5. закрепление навыков письменной речи

Развивающая:

1. развитие логического мышления, активности, внимания;
2. расширение кругозора
3. развитие умений вычленять главное и высказывать свое мнение по запрошенной информации

Воспитательная:

1. Формирование системы нравственных оценок,
2. формирование устойчивой мотивации к изучению английского языка
3. воспитание культуры общения, обучение общению в группах.

Формы работы:

- фронтальная работа (ответы на вопросы)

- групповая работа (обсуждение мнений, дискуссия, ответы на вопросы)

- индивидуальная работа (высказывание мнения по заданной теме)

Ход урока:

I. Организационный момент:

1) Приветствие:

- Good morning, students! I’m very glad to see you! Take your seats, please! What date is it today? Who is absent?

2) Cooбщение темы,  целей и задач урока:

-  Today we have an unusual lesson, we shall have a discussion. The topic of our lesson is “Crime and punishment”, today we should decide whether Graffiti is a crime no not? How should the society react to this problem.

We have guests today, that’s why lets do our best!

II. Основная часть урока.

3) Речевая зарядка

- Look at the pictures, please. How do you find them? Before we discuss our serious topic I would like you to vote. I would like to know your opinion: if you are for graffiti, take a blue card, if you are against, take a red card.

Now we shall have a social survey, we have correspondents in each group who will ask you questions why you are for or against.

4)   Фронтальный опрос

Is graffiti an actual problem? Why?

Is it a crime or not?

Why do you think that it is vandalism?

How should police deal with such petty offence?

Thank you for your opinions!

5) Совершенствование навыков чтения

Now we are going to read a text about gaffers who cover walls of London underground with graffiti, read the text and be ready to decide if the writer is for against people who draw graffiti. Read the text one more time and do some exercises after it.

Let’s discuss the text. Do you share the opinion written in the text? Why?

Thank you for your opinions!

6) Активизация знаний грамматики

Now imagine what would have happened to these teenagers :

• if they had been caught by the police,
• if their parents had known about their occupation
• if the headmaster of their had known about their occupation
• if they had been caught by the private owner of the building they spoil

7) Физкультминутка

I think that you are tired a little bit, let’s have a small break: You will listen to the music and see beautiful pictures of nature. Your task will be draw a graffiti for our school. Let’s see what you will get.

Explain why did you choose this picture?

Where would you draw this picture?

8) Совершенствование навыков письменной речи

You know that every occupation has its own code of rules. Let’s write Code of conduct and code of Punishment for graffers.

How do you find them? What would you add?

III. Заключительный этап урока

9) Подведение итогов урока

Today we learnt a lot of information about graffiti, know got to know how dangerous it can be and that it can be a street art.

Did you change your opinion? Are you still for or against graffiti?

Why? Let’s vote again and see new results.

10) Домашнее задание

Your home task will be to prepare to test work

11) Выставление оценок

Thank you for your great work, I give you excellent marks for today

TEXT

GRAFFITI - A DANGEROUS WAY OF LIFE

Scrawling graffiti is seen as a crime in the UK, yet in the US it has become a recognized art form.

Just a few weeks ago eight graffiti gang members were convicted of causing ￡5,000 worth of damage on the London Underground. They are among more than 70 hard-core graffiti artists thought to be operating in London today. Most are aged under 20.

Graffiti artists, or 'graffers', operate in many British towns. They often work at night, covering walls, trains and railway stations with brightly painted murals or scrawls in spray paint and marker pen.

Some people regard graffiti as a form of vandalism and a menace. London Underground says that railusers find it ugly and offensive. It spends ￡2m a year dealing with graffiti, and has even introduced trains with graffiti-resistant paint. "We don't think it's artistic or creative - it's vandalism.

It's a huge nuisance to our customers, and it's ugly and offensive," says Serena Holley, a spokeswoman for the London Underground. "It creates a sense of anarchy and chaos," says Richard Mandel, a barrister who prosecuted the graffiti gang. "Passengers feel as if the whole rail system is out of control."

British Transport Police has a graffiti unit designed to catch graffers in the act. It spent five months tracking down the recently prosecuted gang.

Graffiti art can also be a dangerous pastime. The London Underground says that some teenagers have died in accidents during nocturnal graffiti 'raids'.

However, others say that graffiti at its best is an art form. Art galleries in London and New York have exhibited work by increasingly famous graffiti artists. "Of course graffiti is art. There's no question about that," says David Grob, director of the Grob Gallery in London. Even some of those who think graffiti is wrong admit that graffers are talented. "It's just that their artistic talent is channeled in the wrong direction," says Barry Kogan, a barrister who represented Declan Rooney, one of the gang members.

There is a difference between 'good graffiti' and vandalism, says Dean Colman, a 24-year-old graffiti artist. "I'd never spray private property, like someone's house. Some graffiti are disgusting.

There's a big difference between that and graffiti which can brighten up grey walls."

Dean makes a living as a graffiti artist. His days of illegal spraying are behind him, he says. He has worked on a television programme about graffiti, designed a series of government posters, and decorated nightclubs. He has exhibited his work at Battersea Arts Centre in London, and he has taught graffiti-spraying in youth clubs.

Dean sees himself as an artist, and thinks that graffiti art does not get due recognition. "There's no graffiti art in the Tate Gallery and there should be," he says. "Graffiti is a valid as any other art form."

Al The graffiti artists arrested recently in London were

1) put in prison.

2) fined ￡5,000.

3) wrongly accused.

4) found guilty.

A2 The attitude of London Underground is that graffiti

1) is a kind of art, but a problem because some passengers don't like it.

2) is something to be stopped at all cost.

3) is irritating but they have more serious problems to worry about.

4) is causing the price of tickets to go up and therefore needs to be stopped.

A3 The British Transport Police

1) have killed some 'graffers' by accident.

2) spent a lot of time trying to catch a group of graffiti artists.

3) have recently criticized the behavior of the London Underground.

4) don't know what to do about the problem.

A4 Bary Kogan, who defended one of the convicted graffiti artists, thinks they

1) should show their work in art galleries.

2) should not have been convicted.

3) should use their abilities in different ways.

4) should be more careful when working in the Underground.

A5 Dean Colman

1) has never broken the law.

2) is concerned about how little he earns from his work with graffiti.

3) would like to see graffiti taken more seriously by the art world.

4) is worried about young people taking up graffiti-spraying.

A6 The writer

1) is for people who draw graffiti.

2) is against people who draw graffiti.

3) points his opinion quite unclearly.

4) supports the attitude of the London Underground towards graffers.