When I read “The Escape” by Somerset Maugham I was impressed by the witty way the main character had found out of a piquant situation.
“His name was Roger Charing. He was no longer young when he fell in love with Ruth Barlow…
Roger introduced her to his friends. He gave her lovely jewels. He took her here, there, and everywhere. Their marriage was announced for the immediate future. Roger was very happy…
Then, on a sudden, he fell out of love…
Roger kept his own counsel. He gave neither by word nor gesture an indication that his feelings towards Ruth Barlow had changed…he was sympathetic and charming. They had made up their minds that they would be married as soon as they found a house that suited them, for he lived in chambers and she in furnished rooms; and they set about looking at desirable residences… It was very hard to find anything that was quite satisfactory…They visited house after house…Roger always found a fault that made the house unsuitable. They looked at hundred of houses; climbed thousands of stairs…”
As a result “Ruth was exhausted and more than once lost her temper… For two years they looked at houses. Ruth grew silent and scornful…”
In the end of the story Roger got a letter from Ruth. The letter read:
“Roger,
I do not think you really love me. I have found someone who is anxious to take care of me and I am going to be married to him to-day.”
It seems the British were keen on the problem of housing. Otherwise how could Roger make Ruth keep looking for a suitable house for two years?
The story by Somerset Maugham gave me the idea of investigating whether the British pay so much attention to housing till now, what kind of houses are popular with the British, what their attitude to private property and to public property is, how important for the British people “home” is.
Besides, a modest attempt has been made to investigate a number of phraseological units containing words “home” and “house” and see what meanings they convey.
Вложение | Размер |
---|---|
dom.doc | 365.24 КБ |
МОУ «Восточно-Европейский лицей»
Housing Preferences of the British
Где предпочитают жить британцы?
Творческая работа выполнена
Журавлевой Дарьей, ученицей 10 информационно-технологического класса
Руководитель: Блинова Е. Г.,
учитель английского языка
Саратов 2008
CONTENTS
Introduction ……………………………………………………………...2
Chapter 1. Houses or Flats ………………………………………………3
Chapter 2. Private Property and Public Property ………………………...4
Chapter 3. Types of Houses ……………………….……………………..5
Chapter 4. The Importance of “Home” ………………………………….7
Chapter 5. Individuality and Conformity ................................................8
Chapter 6. Interiors: The Importance of Cosiness ……………………….9
Chapter 7. Owning and Renting …………………….…………………..11
Chapter 8. Homelessness ……………………………………………… 13
Chapter 9. Should a Gentleman Build His House upon a Rock or upon
the sand? …………………………………………………………………15
Conclusion ……………………………………………………………....25
Bibliography ……………………………………………….……………27
2
INTRODUCTION
When I read “The Escape” by Somerset Maugham I was impressed by the witty way the main character had found out of a piquant situation.
“His name was Roger Charing. He was no longer young when he fell in love with Ruth Barlow…
Roger introduced her to his friends. He gave her lovely jewels. He took her here, there, and everywhere. Their marriage was announced for the immediate future. Roger was very happy…
Then, on a sudden, he fell out of love…
Roger kept his own counsel. He gave neither by word nor gesture an indication that his feelings towards Ruth Barlow had changed…he was sympathetic and charming. They had made up their minds that they would be married as soon as they found a house that suited them, for he lived in chambers and she in furnished rooms; and they set about looking at desirable residences… It was very hard to find anything that was quite satisfactory…They visited house after house…Roger always found a fault that made the house unsuitable. They looked at hundred of houses; climbed thousands of stairs…”
As a result “Ruth was exhausted and more than once lost her temper… For two years they looked at houses. Ruth grew silent and scornful…”
In the end of the story Roger got a letter from Ruth. The letter read:
“Roger,
I do not think you really love me. I have found someone who is anxious to take care of me and I am going to be married to him to-day.”
It seems the British were keen on the problem of housing. Otherwise how could Roger make Ruth keep looking for a suitable house for two years?
The story by Somerset Maugham gave me the idea of investigating whether the British pay so much attention to housing till now, what kind of houses are popular with the British, what their attitude to private property and to public property is, how important for the British people “home” is.
Besides, a modest attempt has been made to investigate a number of phraseological units containing words “home” and “house” and see what meanings they convey.
3
CHAPTER 1
HOUSES OR FLATS
Almost everybody in Britain dreams of living in a detached house; that is, a house which is a separate building. The saying, “An English man's home is his castle” is well-known. It illustrates the desire for privacy which seems to be at the heart of the British attitude to housing.
A large detached house not only ensures privacy. It is also a status symbol. The highest dream of the British is an aristocratic “stately home” set in acres of garden. Of course, such a house is an unrealistic dream for most people. But even a small detached house, surrounded by a garden, would be dear to the hearts of many British people. Most people would be happy to live in a thatched cottage, looking like a house of a pre-industrial age. Most people do not like living in blocks of flats. They think flats do not give enough privacy. With a few exceptions, mostly in certain parts of London, flats are the cheapest kind of home. The people who live in them are those who cannot afford to live anywhere else.
The dislike of living in flats is very strong. In the 1950s millions of poorer people lived in old, cold, uncomfortable nineteenth century houses, often with only an outside toilet and no bathroom. During the next twenty years many nice new “high rise” blocks of flats with central heating and bathrooms were built. They were much more comfortable and were surrounded by grassy open spaces. But people hated their new homes. They said they felt cut off from the world. They couldn't keep a watchful eye on their children playing down there in those lovely green spaces. The new high-rise blocks were quickly destroyed. The lifts broke down. The lights in the corridors didn't work. Windows got broken and were not repaired. There was graffiti all over the walls.
In theory there is no objective reason why these high-rise blocks (also known as “tower blocks”) were not a success. In other countries millions of people live happily in flats. But in Britain they were a failure because they do not suit British attitudes. The failure of high rise blocks of flats has been recognized for several years now. No more high-rises are being built. At the present time, only 4% of the population lives in high-rise blocks of flats. Only 20% of the country's families live in flats of any kind.
4
CHAPTER 2
PRIVATE PROPERTY AND PUBLIC PROPERTY
The idea of a home as a castle suggests a clear demarcation between private property and the public domain. Flats, on the other hand, suggest uncertainties. People who live in flats have a lot of questions: “Who do you share the corridor outside your flat with (with the residents on the same floor or with all residents of the block)? Is the foyer downstairs for the people who live in the block or for the public in general? These uncertainties perhaps explain why the “communal” living is not popular in Britain.
Law and custom seem to support a clear separation between what is public and what is private. For example, people have no general right to reserve the road directly outside their house for their own cars. On the other hand, people seldom keep the bit of pavement outside their house clean and tidy. That is not their job. It is outside their territory.
People prefer to live in houses built a little back from the road. This way, they can have a front garden or a yard as a kind of buffer zone between them and the world. These areas are not usually very big. But they allow people to have low fences, or hedges around them. Usually, these barriers do not physically prevent even a two-year old child from entering, but they have psychological force. They announce to the world where the private property begins.
5
CHAPTER 3
TYPES OF HOUSES
The most desirable home is a detached house.
A detached house is the most expensive type of home. It stands on its own land and is not attached to another building. Such houses have privacy from neighbours, and they are ideal foe keen gardeners who can devote much time to work in their gardens.
The following builder’s advertisement tries to draw a potential buyer’s attention to the advantages of a modern detached house.
The advertisement says:
Second best is a semi-detached (два дома, имеющие общую стену) house. A very large proportion of people live in them. It is one building with separate household (жилыми помещениями). Each house is the mirror of other, inside and out. There are separate front gardens for each house. At the sides, there is an access (проход) to the back, where there will also be two gardens. The typical semi-detached has two floors and three bedrooms.
Less desirable is a terraced house.
This kind of house has a way to the back only through the house itself. Each house in the row (ряд) is joined to the next one. They usually have two floors, with two bedrooms upstairs. Some have gardens back or front, others have no garden at all. Before the 1960s, Britain had millions of terraced houses, most with no inside toilet or bathroom. Many of these were then knocked down, but in some places the houses have become quite desirable – after repairs.
An exception (исключение) is the town house.
These houses can be found in the inner of most cities. There is a great variety regarding (касательно) both design and use. They often have three or more floors, including a basement (подвал) or semi-basement. Although they are usually terraced, those are well- preserved and in a “good” area may be highly desirable. (желанный)
The stately (роскошный) home is highly desirable but mostly among the aristocracy. Many of these families own fine old country houses in which they have lived for hundreds of years. They have a very great emotional investment in their houses.
So, in order to stay in their houses, many aristocrats live lives which are less comfortable (they may not, for example, have central heating). Many have also turned their houses and land into tourist attractions.
The British people feel little attachment (привязанность) to their house as an object. It is the abstract idea of “home” which is important, not the building. The house will be sold when the time and price is right and its the people will move into some other house which they will then turn into “home” - a home which they will love.
The houses themselves are just investments.(вложение денег) An illustration of this is that two-thirds of all inherited (унаследованные) houses are very often sold by the people who inherit (наследовать) them.
This attitude is so dominant that it leads to a strange attitude to house prices. When the prices fall, people think it is a “bad thing”. You may think that it is a good thing, because people can then find somewhere to live more cheaply. We think that rising prices are bad. But with houses in Britain it is the other way around. Falling prices mean that most people cannot afford to sell their house. They have borrowed a lot of money to buy it (sometimes more than its present price). To most British people, such immobility (недвижимость) is a terrible misfortune. (неудача)
People like to choose the colour of their front door and what they are going to do with a little bit of outside territory.
However, not everything about housing in Britain shows indi viduality because most houses are built by organizations, not individuals. For reasons of economy, all the houses on in estate (жилой массив) are usually built to the same design.
But if you walk down the streets of a new estate you will see that every house l seems different. In an attempt (попытка) to achieve (добиться) extra individuality, some people even give their house a name. There is a constant (постоянный) battle going on between the individualistic desires of the residents and the sameness (похожесть) in a popu lated area. This contest (борьба) is illustrated by the fact that anybody who wants to build an extension (пристройка) to their house, or even a garden shed (сарай), must first get “planning permission”(разрешение) from the local authorities. (власти)
Now let me tell you a few words about the importance of cosiness.
British houses have a reputation for being the coldest in Europe. This reputation is exaggerated. In fact, about three-quarters have central heating. However, there is a grain (крупица) of truth in it. Windows, for example, are designed so that they can be easily opened to a great variety of degrees. This way, air can be let into the house in winter without freezing its residents.
The British have a special idea of domestic comfort. The important thing is to feel cosy - that is, to create an atmosphere which seems warm even if it isn't really warm. That is why the British also have a reputation for bad taste.
For many, tradition is part of cosiness, and they surround themselves with old items of furniture. And if you cannot have old furniture, you can always have other old things. The open fire is an example. In Britain, it is desirable to have a “real fire”. It is the perfect traditional symbol of warmth. The attraction of a “real fire” is so strong that many houses have an imitation open fire, complete (заполненный) with plastic coal which shines red when it is switched on.
Most old houses have two living rooms. It allows to keep the front room for formal visits, while family members and close friends can spend their time, hidden from public view, in the back room. Most modern houses are built with just one living room. However, privacy must be preserved (оберегаться) so these houses have a “hall” into which the front door opens. Some houses also have a small “porch”, with its own door as an extra line of defence!
Owning or renting is a very important question for the British.
The desire to own the place where you live is almost universal in Britain. However, house prices are high. This dilemma is overcome by the mortgage [‘mo:gidз] system. (ипотечная система)
About 70% of all the houses in the country are occupied by their owners and almost all of these were bought with a mortgage. Half of these houses are owned by people who have borrowed 80% of their price and are now paying this money back month by month. Usually the borrower pays back the money over a period of twenty to twenty-five years.
In the 1950s and 1960s millions of homes were built by local govern ment . authorities. By 1977, two-thirds of all residents lived in these “council houses” or flats.
Then during the 1980s, the number of owner-occupiers (собственники) increased (возросло). A major part of the philosophy of Thatcherism (under Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher) was the idea of the “property-owning democracy”. Council residents were allowed to buy their council houses.
There are homeless people in Britain. In 1993 there were half a million homeless people in Britain - that's one of the highest proportions of the popu lation in all the countries of Europe. The supply (ресурсы) of council housing is limited. In addition, many council houses and flats were badly built and are now uninhabitable. (нежилые)
In the early 1990s many people suddenly faced the prospect (перспектива) of homelessness. They had taken out large mortgages to buy their homes at a time when the country was going through an economic boom. Many of these people lost their jobs and so could no longer afford the monthly mortgage payments. To make matters worse, the prize of houses, unusually, fell sharply at this time. People had to sell their homes, often for less than they bought them, and so were in debt as well as homeless.
Some families or single people find shelter in hostels for the homeless which are run by charitable organizations. Thousands of single people simply live on the streets. The phrase “cardboard city” became well-known in the 1980s to describe areas of big cities where large numbers of homeless people camped out, protected from the weather only by cardboard boxes.
Recently have appeared young people of new lifestyle (often known as “New Age Travellers”) Their homes are the buses in which they move from place to place.
Thank you for attention.
Could you characterize in short housing situation in Russia?
As far as I can judge most Russian people in towns and cities live in flats.
Before 1960s most people lived in old houses where rooms were occupied de different families with a common kitchen, often without a bathroom. In 1960 new five-storied blocks of flats appeared. Families began to get their own flats. Though, they were not owners. They rented the flats from the state. Later, in 1970s new high rise blocks of flats gas and central heating were built. But it’s common knowledge people don’t care for corridors in their blocks. The lifts often break down. The lights in the corridors don’t work. The windows get broken and are not repaired. There are graffiti all over the walls.
In small towns and villages people live in their own houses, but most of then have no modern conveniences.
Rather few people can afford a modern detached house, though, they are becoming more in number nowadays.
I think the Russian would like to live in their own houses. But in Russia there few people who can use a mortgage system because the interest which they will have to pay back is too high. To tell the truth people are now allowed to privatize the flats where they live. But still housing situation leaves much to be desired.
Простые летающие модели из бумаги
Акварельные гвоздики
Загадка старого пирата или водолазный колокол
Сторож
Швейня